Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Fury over ARB's postal vote bid to increase retention fee

  • Comment
The ARB's leadership is launching another 'highly unusual' bid to increase the retention fee.

Last week at a board meeting, members of the ARB Reform Group threatened to walk out - and leave the board 'inquorate' - if the proposal was pushed through.

The board's leadership, who wanted to up the retention fee by £1.50, was forced to drop the bid.

But now lay member Alan Crane, with the support of chairman Humphrey Lloyd and vice-chair Sarah Lupton, has launched a bid to get the increase approved by a postal vote.

This move, which is highly unusual, is sure to be greeted with disgust by members of the Reform Group, who believed they had killed off the increase.

The postal vote can be seen as a move designed to counter the Reform Group's policy of threatening a walk-out when it looks like they will be defeated on motions that are important to them.

The reformers are known to be furious with Crane for launching the postal vote, with some predicting that this is 'the beginning of the end'.

The reform group, which wants the board's work severely pared back, rose to prominence during the last board elections when they picked up over 70 per cent of the vote and the top four places in the ballot.

However, they do not hold a majority on the board because of the preponderance of laypeople, who are appointed.

by Ed Dorrell

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.