Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Furore over proposed Modern addition to Chichester Church

  • Comment
A Chichester Modernist with two high-profile backers has lashed out after English Heritage mauled his proposals for a church extension.

Anthony Perry's work on the Church of St Andrew in Chichester was thrown out by councillors late last month - despite being praised by two former bosses of the Royal Fine Art Commission.

Both Sherban Cantacuzino and the late Professor Freddie Fielden had lent their support to the project.

But local politicians at Chichester District Council's area development committee rejected the application and English Heritage's David Brock labelled Perry's supporters 'too exalted'.

In addition, Perry's proposed Modernist addition - the octagonal structure pictured - was deemed by the council to be out of context with the original 12-14th-century building and a 1981 extension.

Perry said: 'There's a very strong tendency in Chichester to continue the neo-vernacular style that is liked locally. We're trying to be very clear about what we're doing.'

But Brock attempted to justify EH's objections.'I do think doing something Modern in this location would be doing something wrong. I would have liked to have seen what we could have got out of another gable,' he said.

However the founder of the Chichester Society David Goodman said of the plan: 'I think it's a charming addition. It's strongly approved of by those who know what they are talking about.'

by Rob Sharp

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.