Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Frank Gehry's King Alfred scheme scrapped

  • Comment
After five years, Gehry's Brighton project is finally dropped

Frank Gehry’s controversial King Alfred development has officially been scrapped, ending a five-year rollercoaster ride for the troubled £290 million ‘wonky towers’ scheme.

Last night (9 November), the final nail was hammered into the coffin after Brighton & Hove City Council admitted the deadline for developer Karis to come up with a funder to replace Dutch bank ING had expired.

The bank walked away from the hugely contentious mixed-use development – dubbed ‘tin can alley’ by locals – back in August.

The radical twin-tower scheme, which was designed with HOK and Piers Gough’s practice CZWG, would have created 750 apartments and an all-new community sports centre on the seafront plot.

However, the authority said it would now have ‘to go back to square one’ to work out how improved sports facilities could ‘be provided with the existing building and site'.

Mary Mears, leader of the council, said: ‘We need to work out a way forward. While we’d like much better sports facilities, we need to ensure that any development required to pay for them is acceptable in terms of size and appearance.'

She added: ‘The situation is very much complicated by the current economic downturn. Virtually all major public works these days are dependent on private investment and at the moment that has dried up.

‘However, we want to see a refurbished King Alfred leisure centre and we will do everything we can to ensure that happens.’

Karis director Josh Arghiros is understood to have spent £13 million on the failed scheme.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.