Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Francis Terry launches rival design for Mount Pleasant housing scheme


Classical architect Francis Terry has challenged Allies and Morrison, Wilkinson Eyre, FCBS and AHMM ‘fortress’ with alternative designs for the Royal Mail site

Campaigners fighting plans for a major London housing scheme designed by Allies and Morrison, Wilkinson Eyre, Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios and Allford Hall Monaghan Morris have brought in the Neo-classical architect Francis Terry to work up an audacious rival proposal.

The redevelopment by Royal Mail of its Mount Pleasant sorting office site in Clerkenwell, one of the largest remaining brownfield sites in central London, proposes 680 homes in 10 buildings designed by the four practices.

Since being unveiled in 2012, the plan has faced fierce opposition from local residents unhappy with its ‘fortress-like’ layout. The scheme is currently being considered by London mayor Boris Johnson, who called in the project in January.

Now Terry has revealed an alternative ‘Mount Pleasant Circus and Fleet Valley Gardens’ design (above) drawn up with built environment lobbyist Create Streets, which is working on behalf of residents’ action group the Mount Pleasant Association.

The architect, who, with his father, runs Quinlan & Francis Terry Architects, famously had a hand in derailing Richard Rogers’ scheme for Chelsea Barracks after sketching an alternative design seized upon by the scheme’s arch-opponent, Prince Charles.

Terry said: ‘I did [intervene in] Chelsea Barracks a while ago so I was interested in trying to do something civic and helpful for the oppressed locals here.’

In February, designer Thomas Heatherwick branded the existing Mount Pleasant plan ‘empty, cynical and vacuous’ and, despite a subsequent climbdown by Heatherwick, Terry said he agreed with this.

He said: ‘I echo Tom’s view. The reason people like London is because of areas like Farringdon; but the current proposal is just like any other city.’

Create Streets, which campaigns for conventional terraced streets and insists it has no style agenda, argues that Terry’s plan is proving highly popular with locals and would deliver 730 homes – 7 per cent more than the existing scheme – and greater value for the taxpayer, given that it has a 30 per cent stake in Royal Mail.

It says research by leading urban planning consultant Space Syntax demonstrates the new proposal would create pedestrian routes 75 per cent more accessible than the Royal Mail plan.

Edward Denison, secretary of the Mount Pleasant Association, said: ‘We have said: “Look at the logical routes people would take going from Hackney to Soho and from Bloomsbury to Clerkenwell – it’s the planning brief for the site which needs to be challenged”.’

The association also complained to the GLA and DCLG this week after claiming that the mayor had unfairly predetermined his planning decision on the Mount Pleasant scheme by publicly calling it ‘a beautiful design’ and ‘a wonderful place to live’.

Royal Mail group property director Martin Gafsen said: ‘Royal Mail’s proposed scheme to redevelop parts of its Mount Pleasant site will create up to 680 new homes, including the maximum reasonable proportion of affordable housing and create publicly accessible open space, new thoroughfares and jobs.’

Allies and Morrison and AHMM declined to comment. The other project architects were unavailable to comment.

Previous story (AJ 30.06.14)

Boris accused of bias over Mount Pleasant overhaul

Mayor of London Boris Johnson has been accused of bias following his comments praising the controversial Mount Pleasant scheme in central London.

Johnson, who has called in the scheme, has been accused of favouritism after he said the scheme was ‘a beautiful design’ and ‘a wonderful place to live’.

Speaking at the LBC ‘State of London’ debate on June 25 at the O2 Johnson said: ‘Every week I get the Islington Tribune denouncing me for trying to get some scheme going at Mount Pleasant which will deliver thousands of homes for Londoner’s because they don’t like it because they don’t like the design.

‘We can’t have it all ways, we can’t insist that we build rows of thatched cottages and simultaneously

‘Sometimes my colleagues in the boroughs can be a little bit slow in getting things off the ground.’

Considered one of the biggest housing developments in central London, the 680-home scheme by AHMM, Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios, Wilkinson Eyre and Allies & Morrison. was rejected unanimously by both Islington and Camden Councils. It has been criticised for the high density of the development and the fact it will provide only around 12 per cent affordable housing.

Johnson has a legal obligation as the planning authority presiding over the scheme to remain neutral. The Mayor called in the £100m development stating that the decision needed speeding up.

Residents in Clerkenwell have stated that the Mayor has ignored their calls that the scheme could be disastrous.

Edward Denison, secretary of the Mount Pleasant Association has called the Mayor of pre-determining’ the decision over the scheme.

Speaking to the Islington Tribune, Jenette Arnold, London Assembly member for Islington said that Johnson was ‘deaf to our pleadings and blind to our lives.

‘This man does not know what being objective is.’

The Mount Pleasant scheme has attracted criticism from both architects and designers. Earlier this year designer Thomas Heathewick called the scheme ‘empty, cynical and vacuous’


Readers' comments (3)

  • This is about the WRONG BRIEF. The site is complex, centred in London WC/EC and it needs an urban response, not an invasion of clustered towers. Can the GLA and the mayor not see that? It will be a catastrophe in civic terms and RMG needs to wake up to their responsibilities to London as a whole and to us as the existing local population.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The street with its visual and repetitive links to the pedestrian and the passer by is the essence of London's urbanity, any new scheme must understand and reflect this.

    John Melvin
    John Melvin Architects and Town Planners

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One wonders whether there was a brief? If there was an urban design assessment which I doubt, how did it inform either the first of the alternative Terry scheme?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more