Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Former RIBA president joins call to revoke Boris’s fellowship

Shutterstock boris johnson crop

Former RIBA president Angela Brady has joined an army of architects calling for the institute to revoke the honorary fellowship it awarded to Boris Johnson when she was at the helm

Brady – who chaired the RIBA Honours Committee in 2011 when it recognised Johnson’s ‘enormous contribution’ to architecture – signed a letter urging the institute to take the title back.

Johnson was mayor of London when he was made an honorary fellow, and Brady was president of the RIBA. Now prime minister, Johnson is under the spotlight after the Supreme Court ruled his decision to suspend Parliament for five weeks in the run-up to the UK’s scheduled departure from the EU was unlawful.

The far-reaching verdict came just days after the Scottish Court of Session also found Johnson’s advice to the queen to prorogue Parliament was unlawful.

Brady and fellow 2011 RIBA Honours Committee panellist Sarah Wigglesworth – as well as scores of leading architects – have demanded the honorary fellowship be revoked in light of the court findings.

Their letter – which will be presented to RIBA Council next week – points to the terms of reference of the honours committee, which outline a ‘fit and proper person’ test. Under this test, the institute says it will consider recommending revocation of an honorary fellowship if its recipient does not ‘act with honesty, integrity and legality at all times’.

Immediate past RIBA president Ben Derbyshire said discussion of Johnson’s fellowship was ‘inevitable’ at next week’s council meeting.

’After [Wednesday] night’s Commons debate, it’s clear his behaviour fails to meet the standards in our new code of conduct for members,’ Derbyshire wrote on Twitter before adding: ‘Sadly this does not apply to honorary posts.’

Walter Menteth, founder of London practice Walter Menteth Architects, organised the campaign to revoke the fellowship.

‘Individual architects, the RIBA as its professional institute and the representatives of our collective professionalism subscribe to behaviour that is lawful, proper and befitting,’ he said.

‘In our long history as a profession, no individual has or can be seen to be above those standards. When the public responsibility of professions and institutions is being tested, no benefit is to be had for democratic civil society by professions and institutions not sustaining the consistent application of those standards.

‘I would hope RIBA Council will reconfirm the institute’s integrity and do what is fit and proper. From the multiple evidence, it seems to me, unequivocally, that it is only right that the institute revoke this honour.’

Other signatories of the letter include Julia Barfield of Marks Barfield, RIBA co-vice president for students and associates Simeon Shtebunaev, long-standing Brexit critic Piers Taylor and celebrated social-housing architect Kate Macintosh.

Readers wanting to add their names can email revokeribahon@gmail.com before midday on Tuesday 1 October, stating clearly any RIBA or other professional suffix.

The RIBA has been contacted for comment.


Readers' comments (24)

  • I can't think of a bigger waste of time than getting embroiled in this. Its just time wasting by the left leaning London Bubble members of the profession. I'd far rather the RIBA got on with promoting the benefits of employing an architect rather than raising this honour that's unknown in the public eye into that arena, which could end up embroiling the next presidency just like the pointlessly distracting Africa debacle embroiled Hodder's. However, let it be a lesson for the future: don't give honours to politicians, its too controversial and their standing can rapidly change, and is irrelevant to the health and prospects of the profession.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Concentrate on climate change and promoting architects and leave racist, mysogynist, bullying, loud-mouthed, corrupt, rich public school boys to their own fate.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Come on Louis, get off the fence!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I second Ian Morrsion's 'Humbug' call on Brady's statement.
    And who is this 'army' of architects that Brady claims to exist?
    The RIBA should stay out of party politics.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • MacKenzie Architects

    Judge & Jury now are we, how glorious.
    I don't care about whether Boris has or has not an Honorary anything, these type of things seem more about the awarders' opinion of themselves * than the awardee, and should be handed out very sparingly -at the end of a career.

    To seek to withdraw it, just reeks of the same * -we are just Architects, and barely that. Get over yourselves.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Personally, I prefer Butterscotch to Humbugs, the Garden Bridge wasted £40m, and squeezing people’s thighs under the dinner table rarely has the desired outcome?

    It’s now a cliche, But Keep Calm and Carry On? Brexit will happen, and the world will keep turning; so keep doing your best for all our clients. Bugger Boris and Bognor Regis? Or rescind the “Regis” title??

    Woke up Snowflakes? Or is that just too horrid?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does the code of conduct not apply to Fellows, despite being gifted their post nominals? Boris Johnson ( Hon. FRIBA )

    9.1 Members must ensure that all marketing and
    promotional material used to promote their
    services is:
    (a) legal, decent and truthful;
    (b) fair to others; and
    (c) accurate in respect of the level of
    expertise and resources being offered
    by the Member.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In response to Ian Morrison’s comment above. If you think that the Supreme Court created a new law, you need to actually read their judgement. They have merely upheld a long standing principle of law and parliamentary practice which had not been tested in this way before. Since the piece is about integrity - please check your own.

    But your argument about this all whiffing of the Remainiac ‘elite’ is valid, though I don’t agree with it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm on the offence, Paul

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As an ex-public schoolboy, I take offence at Louis remarks, which amount to person abuse. Most of us are jolly decent fellows!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.