Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Feilden Clegg Bradley appeals against Mildmay refusal - images

  • Comment

Feilden Clegg Bradley (FCB) is appealing against the refusal last year of its ambitious Mildmay Urban Village (MUV) ‘supportive housing’ project.

The move ends months of speculation about the future of the potentially groundbreaking ‘social housing experiment’ in Shoreditch, east London, which was unanimously turned down by Tower Hamlet’s planning committee last December (Tower Hamlets rejects Feilden Clegg Bradley’s ‘social experiment’ housing).Backed by homeless charity Crisis, the Mildmay Mission Hospital, Shoreditch Tabernacle Baptist Church, the Genesis Housing Group and English Partnerships, the proposed scheme would see the creation of 370 homes for the homeless on the edge of the City.However, despite the scheme receiving support from both CABE and the authority’s own planners, the Tower Hamlets committee felt it could not approve the project, which would feature a 23-storey residential tower.Now MUV chiefs, who vowed to battle on after the surprising council knockback, have settled on launching an appeal against the decision rather than substantially reworking the original design.A spokesman said: ‘The partners are confident that the proposed development meets the criteria within current planning policy and guidelines and as such have decided to appeal against the Tower Hamlets Council decision.’A lot of thought, planning and consultation went into our proposal, which represents a 60 million investment in one of the most deprived boroughs in London.’We have developed a solution which addresses the urgent needs for high-quality affordable housing and believe MUV will bring significant benefits to the whole community and help to regenerate the area.’Intriguingly, since the unexpected council decision last year, the budget for the development seems to have risen by 7 million - according to earlier reports the scheme was to have come in at around 53 million.by Richard Waite

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.