Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

DSDHA’s Belgravia housing scheme faces resident backlash

  • 1 Comment

DSDHA’s planned redevelopment of a 1950s housing estate in central London’s Belgravia for Grosvenor is facing a backlash from residents

The developer appointed the practice in April to demolish 111 private flats on Cundy Street and to flatten the neighbouring Walden House, a 40-home council estate built on Grosvenor-owned land.

The developer wants to build new private and affordable homes to replace the existing mansion blocks, built on a bombsite in the early 1950s, as part of its new ‘Cundy Street Quarter’.

But residents living in Walden House are fighting back against the project, which they say will see them displaced from their homes. A petition against the scheme has more than 100,000 signatures. 

A spokesperson for the Save Cundy and Walden House group said residents in the council-run block faced the prospect of either bidding for properties outside the borough or being left homeless. 

’There is nothing wrong with what are beautiful buildings,’ they said. ‘This is just about an opportunity to build a big investment development on prime central London land.

‘The families that will be displaced are seen as getting in the way of profits. Grosvenor have made no commitment to existing residents and the community there, and no concrete commitment to social housing.’

According to the group, consultation events never presented a ‘no demolition’ option, and ‘all the questions are framed so as to give legitimacy to whatever Grosvenor want to do’. 

Grosvenor property group, which is owned by the Duke of Westminster, argues the site’s regeneration will provide a ’material increase in much-needed high-quality housing in Westminster’. 

The developer said it first notified its Cundy Street tenants of its redevelopment plans back in 2012.

A spokesperson said: ‘Since this notification, we have been providing tailored support, over and above what is required of us, to help them plan carefully for the future.’

With regards to Walden House, the spokesperson said Grosvenor had given Westminster Council an additional two years on the lease, providing ’substantially more time for suitable new homes to be found’.

Grosvenor has said it is committed to re-providing the affordable housing currently on site. As the plans are still in development it remains unclear what percentage of affordable the scheme will be targeting.

Craig McWilliam, Grosvenor’s chief executive, recently published a statement discussing the ‘lack of trust’ between developers and communities.

In Changing our approach: The Cundy Street Quarter, McWilliam said he wanted to bring greater ‘transparency, understanding, public scrutiny and involvement’ to the company’s development proposals.

‘Some are understandably upset at our decision to demolish these buildings even if they appreciate that doing so gives us the chance to create a better place with more homes for more people. We won’t deny those feelings as we open ourselves up.’

He explained the company had had more than 500 conversations during the public consultation and had collected ’over 1,500 points of view influencing our plans’.

McWilliam added: ‘We’re offering residents, workers and visitors the chance to post their comments and poll their opinions through a new user-friendly app.’

DSDHA was approached for comment.

Photo © n chadwick (cc by sa:2.0)

Photo © n chadwick (cc by sa:2.0)

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • 'Much needed high quality housing in Westminster' - no surprise, but by whom?
    Could it be primarily by investors in an internationally tradable commodity?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more