Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Developer could have to rebuild London pub brick by brick

  • 1 Comment

Westminster City Council looks set to force the developer behind the demolition of an historic London pub to rebuild an exact replica on the site

On 8 April, the Carlton Tavern pub in Kilburn, which was due to be recommended for listing, was flattened without City of Westminster Council being informed.

Council officers have since prepared an enforcement notice which could see developer CTLX facing an order to restore the pub to its original condition within 18 months.

John Walker, director of planning at Westminster City Council, said: ‘Obviously, we cannot pre-empt any decision, but this shows how important the issue is to local residents and the council, and officers have worked hard to bring this to the committee as quickly as possible.

‘We are still liaising with Historic England and DCMS and the advice provided by them will help to determine the final course of action.’

The enforcement notice is subject to confirmation from the culture secretary that the building would have been listed. It is understood Historic England (formerly English Heritage) was poised to recommend the 1920s public house for listing.

A letter sent to the council by Historic England on 30 March – just over a week before the demolition – said that the heritage watchdog was treating the case as ‘urgent’.

The council report also revealed that it believes the demolition was in breach of amendments to protect historic pubs from demolition which came into force just two days before the demolition.

The new rules allow buildings under threat to be designated as protected ‘assets of community value’ before or after applications to demolish them are submitted.

A report by planning officers released this week also gave more details about the chain of events surrounding the demolition.

It said that, at 1pm on 8 March, calls to the council’s call centre and from a local councillor advised that demolition works were underway.

By the time a council planning enforcement officer arrived around an hour later, the building had been substantially demolished with only a side wall and a small part of the front elevation still standing.

The report said that the structure was in a dangerous condition. ‘It was clear that the building had been demolished with extreme haste without the usual precautions of hoardings, road closures, etc, and there was evidence that fixtures and fittings that had not been removed prior to the commencement of the demolition works.’

The report said that rubble on site is likely to contain fragments which are sufficiently intact to recreate details of the building including as internal joinery and plasterwork. However it said that sourcing external facing materials are likely to be expensive and time-consuming to procure.

Photos and old plans from archive stories could be used to guide the rebuilding process, the report added.

Westminster listed a number of previous cases in the borough where facsimile rebuilding has taken place, including another enforcement case at 48 Upper Grosvenor Street which is being restored following the unlawful destruction of its Art Deco mirrored interior.


  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • I hope the architects for the proposed replacement building have the sense to wash their hands of this project - if cowboy clients have difficulty in finding architects who are willing to jump into bed with them it would be good for both the profession and the country.
    I also hope that the nationwide company whose name was emblazoned on the demolition plant has to account for just what they thought they were doing - otherwise it's difficult to see them retaining some of their largest clients.
    Lastly, I hope that the resolve of the authorities involved doesn't waver, isn't undermined by 'behind the scenes' influence being brought to bear, and that this building really does rise from the dead.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.