Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Spending review: £2 billion capital boost saves flagship projects


The government today (20 October) unveiled plans to boost capital spending, safeguarding a raft of cultural and infrastructure projects

As part of the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR), the chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne announced capital spending would be £2 billion a year higher than set out in the emergency budget in June when the government axed £11 billion worth of capital projects.

Total capital spending, he said, would be: ‘£51 billion next year, then £49 billion, then £46 billion, and £47 billion in 2014-15.’

Projects saved include: Herzog and De Meuron’s Tate Gallery extension and Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners’ British Museum extension project.

Foreign Office Architects’ redevelopment of Birmingham New Street Station has also been safeguarded, and so too has Crossrail and the PLP and HOK-designed UKCMRI project in Camden, north London.

Osborne explained: ‘When money is short we should ruthlessly prioritise those areas of public spending which are most likely to support economic growth, including investments in our transport and green energy infrastructure, our science base and the skills and education of citizens.’

A new bridge over the Mersey at Runcorn will also be built and funding will be made to available to the St Helier, Royal Oldham and West Cumberland new hospitals schemes.

Further detail on projects receiving funding is expected to be announced shortly.


Readers' comments (2)

  • So, at a time when "We are all in this together" a couple of eye wateringly expense vanity projects that will mainly benefit foreign tourists in London escape the axe? Also - does the UKCMRI really have to be in the capital?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The sacrifice of cabe to pay for these second rate schemes is an abomination. New Street YES but Tate and British Museum extensions NO Both projects are entirely out of keeping with an 'age of austerity'

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more