Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

HS2 Northern route revealed

  • 1 Comment

The government has revealed the 340 km-long preferred route for High Speed 2 (HS2) north of Birmingham

The Y-shaped extension to the £32.7 billion network includes five new stations and is planned to complete by 2033.

The preferred route will serve Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield, Crewe and the East Midlands. It is expected the next phase will extend the network to Scotland.

Criticism has already been raised over Sheffield’s station which will be at Meadowhall shopping centre on the outskirts rather than in the city centre. Transferring from Meadowhall to the city centre could make the high speed service slower than existing connections.

A new East Midlands hub at Toton would also serve Nottingham and Derby.

Journey times from Manchester to London would be halved to one hour eight minutes while travelling to the capital from Leeds would take just 1 hour and 22 minutes.

A planned spur linking HS2 to Heathrow was not included in the announcement.

A consultation is planned to start this year with the phase two route planned to be finalized by 2014.

Network Rail described the project as a ‘once-in-a-generation opportunity’ to transform connectivity in the UK.

David Higgins, Network Rail chief executive, said: ‘Unprecedented growth in the last ten years has seen passenger journeys grow by 50 per cent to almost 1.5bn a year and that number is set to continue to grow. More people use the railways today than at any time since the Second World War, on a network half the size it was then.

‘We are already delivering the biggest capacity improvement programme since the Victorian era, but even this is not enough. Without HS2 the West Coast Main Line – our busiest and most economically important line – will be full in a little over a decade. This is a rare chance to stop playing catch-up on capacity. If we get ahead of the game we can create huge opportunities for growth and connectivity.’

He went on to claim HS2 was ‘not a bolt-on piece of infrastructure’, explaining Network Rail was already planning how to integrate the rail line with existing routes.

City of Edinburgh Council leader Andrew Burns called for an ‘early announcement’ on the next phase which is expected to join the planned high speed rail connection between the Scottish capital and Glasgow.

Glasgow City Council leader Gordon Matheson said: ‘It is essential that construction of a high speed rail route begins at both ends of the country and meets in the middle.

‘If it doesn’t then I believe our people and economy will be the losers - cut off from our major markets in England and Europe and at a huge economic disadvantage.’


Further comment

Alan Muse, RICS director of built environment

HS2 has huge potential to drive economic growth, along with lowering carbon emissions and expanding the capacity and speed of the UK’s transport network, which still seriously lags behind other countries.

RICS believes high-speed rail will be hugely important in supporting economic growth and recovery by linking major economic centres for trade and investment. HS2 is highly anticipated by Midland and Northern cities which will benefit from the increased connectivity and wider property based opportunities. To deliver this growth we need to get the ‘shovel ready’ infrastructure projects up and running. With the HS2 and the Network Rail announcement on upgrade spending, rail has emerged as the transport sector that could begin to drive local economies. Setting up regional pipelines for this work must come next.

The launch of IUK’s infrastructure procurement road map is essential to this in bringing sponsor, client and supply chain closer together and working out what capability exists to deliver a project in the most cost effective and timely manner. RICS particularly welcome the move to transplant the ‘informed client’ approach from buildings to infrastructure, which amongst other benefits will mean earlier engagement and opportunities for SMEs.

Major public infrastructure schemes, such as HS2, require state-of-the-art project, carbon and cost management techniques to ensure optimum value for money and accountability. Through the use of new procurement models, information modelling and data benchmarking, RICS feels that investment in the relevant techniques and skills is the way to ensure project success.




  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Following this topic incidentally and lazily on a couple of occasions from mainly a Scottish perspective last May and June - and more recently Midlands too, namely Birmingham to Preston (6 days ago) - from comment #6 onwards on the following thread link; I'd look forward to a serious consultation making sense of an internationally linked HSR network for Britain rather than on a per nation basis:


    Too many midlands stations for HS2 will surely clog up such a system and make a total mess of the natural and built environments. We need our leaders to politically steer this economically and consult ICE on the top speeds between London – Birmingham(?) - Preston (tee hee) – and Perth; to assess and determine viability.

    Glasgow, Edinburgh, Manchester etc. can all upgrade their independent existing system to 200mph by all means, but we really need to be thinking at least 400mph for HSR and therefore need an HSR that’s not initially held back by being linked prematurely to too many post-industrial cities as commuter transport.

    [Whimsically speaking on a once similar dream, pardon me for asking this: would it still be too early to dodge George Bennie royalties on the ca1930 Rail-plane prototype as built by a lifts industrialist in Glasgow if it were likely that such transport would supersede HSR in terms of speed and viability, at the very least for commuting purposes as once considered? Probably, I hasten to say! Again, if it’s not too early to capitalise on such a venture in the waiting (nor too competitive with actual air travel), ask ICE! I bet it’ll beat HSR easily on most of the main issues fronts, albeit unfamiliar territory to all i.e. as an invention not off the ground yet.



    I suppose that’s as much about brainstorming as whim!]

    Britain, not merely Scotland, should continue making waves in the evolution of all transport and the engineering support and nous behind it. Let’s not keep the most enthused engineers in the world relatively idle for the following century, or keep them back by thinking so small, after what’s been achieved since James Watt... Let’s not outsource these qualities like it was Britain’s manufacturing base. Let’s keep our brains at least. Good luck Britain!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more