Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Degree show review 2019: The Bartlett

  • Comment

The Bartlett’s show is sometimes in danger of only being about graphic storytelling

Typically, the Bartlett show consists of an overwhelming, almost-dystopian mix of laboured and intricate work, distractingly overridden by crammed curation attempting to showcase more than 600 students’ work across seven floors of crit space and stair core of the school’s 22 Gordon Street home.  

Upon reviewing it, one can get overwhelming flashbacks to previous portfolio hand-in, understanding how much time, stress and sweat went into their creation, but this time with an almost nostalgic reflection on the time and satisfaction spent in making such detailed, beautiful work.

Pg16 19 cameronovery 24

Pg16 19 cameronovery 24

One can always be critical of the Bartlett show: there’s ethical issues with it for sure. The way the work is presented, the amount of printing and expensive techniques utilised, the study trips abroad as part of each unit’s narrative and research always highlight the amount of time and money that goes into the making of the Bartlett’s annual ‘wow factor’. There is an unfairness in in resource when comparing it with other architecture schools, which just don’t stand a chance in comparison when putting together their own degree shows.

The other issue that this show always highlights is the disjunction between architectural education and practice – just how relevant to current architectural discourse is this fascinating spectacle of a drawing collection?

None of the units feel like they are aiming to ‘save our communities’

There’s no denying that the drawings presented are utterly beautiful, graphically enthralling and demonstrate a great skillset and attention to detail but, in contrast with the live projects of Sheffield or CSM, for example, none of the units feel like they are aiming to ‘save our communities’. It is very much a ‘parallel world’ that they are portraying instead. Though it is understandable that every student goes through the dilemma of how realistic a project should be, the work therefore feels indulgent. 

As there should be, this year there is a slight nod to our global political climate and current affairs. For example, Postgraduate Unit 10’s Vilius Vizgaudis relates an interpretation of Hieronymus Bosch’s painting The Conjurer to the Paris Climate Agreement. The whole unit, Virtues of Urban Resilience, stands out for its uniform, striking A0-sized statement posters, placed alongside bibles of fabrication manuals, immaculately put together with attention to detail which convinces and reassures that perhaps such an unworldly scheme would actually work.

Vilius Vizgaudis, PG Unit 10

Vilius Vizgaudis, PG Unit 10

Vilius Vizgaudis, PG Unit 10

Strangely, time and time again, the work of the Bartlett is a distorted mix of the organic bespoke versus rigidly standardised components, emphasising process and making much more than the building and function itself. The colourful models of Postgraduate Unit 13, Hidden Spectacle, look at ‘fabrication as a spectacle’ – seemingly a continuous theme throughout the show. Undergraduate Unit 4, Great Expectations, run by Office S&M, however, attempts to confront the ‘generic’ forms of the ‘brick-chic’ and ‘biscuit architecture’ of London’s landscape, also through the medium of brightly coloured, fun models.

Hand-drawn perspectives and photoshopped axonometric views are often much more intriguing, inviting more imagination and evoking a greater sense of escapism than a CGI visual or rendered section. Undergraduate Unit 10’s Megan King’s The Lijnbaan Seam suggests an alternative structure for environmental fashion, the hand-drawn, layered sections utterly beautiful.

Despite a large proportion of visually dystopian drawings, as always, there seems to be a continuous theme of hope throughout the show.

Ug10 19 meganking 12

Ug10 19 meganking 12

Postgraduate Unit 16, Quasi-Agency, Material Wonder and Explorations on the Edge of the World, explores architecture that re-emphasises our relationship with the environments we choose to inhabit. Cameron Overy’s project The Policy of Space questions environmental policy relating to forestry cultivation in Sweden in an overarching discussion of rewilding.

Postgraduate Unit 15 Lost Architectures & New Tribes is particularly joyful for how it demonstrates the interdisciplinary aspects of art and architecture – their corner of the show creating more of a mini-museum, rather than an exhibition: a mix of drawings, objects and, weirdly, T-shirts.

Finally, Postgraduate Unit 12 student Francesca Savvides’ project Building a Case for a New Practitioner is inspired by the current movement of architects to local authorities, such as is the case with Public Practice, but this time revisiting the unrealised work of post-war London. The drawings have just the right amount of dystopic monotone to evoke a feeling of Brutalism in abstract images of projects. The unit’s introduction quotes: ‘The architect is a ‘physical novelist’ as well as a “physical historian’’’. One feels that this perhaps sums up what the Bartlett’s show is sometimes in danger of only being about: graphic storytelling. 

Student subscription offer 

Did you know students get 30% off AJ subscriptions? Find out more!

 

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs