Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Critical debate on Palace of Westminster refurb delayed

  • 1 Comment

Ministers have put back a debate on the huge and increasingly urgent programme of works required at the dilapidated Palace of Westminster

MPs were due to discuss the future of the home of the Houses of Commons and Lords on 11 January but leader of the House of Commons Andrea Leadsom postponed the debate after being urged not to hold it on a Thursday, as MPs whose constituencies are a long distance away tend to return on Thursdays and parliamentary attendance can consequently be low.

A statement from the Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal Programme said: ‘The debate to discuss the future of the Palace of Westminster and the increasingly urgent works, originally set in the Commons for 11 January 2018, has been postponed by the government to a yet-to-be-confirmed future date.’

It added: ‘Andrea Leadsom announced before Christmas that the government will now look to find a suitable alternative date, taking account of representations she had received for the debate not to be scheduled on a Thursday.’

Last year BDP beat Foster + Partners, Allies and Morrison and HOK to win the design contract for the restoration, which could cost as much as £6 billion. CH2M was chosen to deliver programme, project and cost management services on the scheme.

An independent options appraisal drawn up by HOK more than two years ago suggested five main scenarios for parliament’s overhaul, depending to what extent MPs stayed in the building while works were done.

Last month, Michael Hopkins, the architect of Portcullis House, said MPs could use the 2001 building’s atrium as a temporary chamber while the Houses of Parliament were being restored.

Paul Finch this week warned that a lack of expertise was hampering attempts to work out a strategy for the refurbishment project.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • The PoW is long past it's sell by date, the architecture does not catalyse modern politics in any shape or form. It's design encourages a class based , public school type of confrontational politics, we need a new building. Maybe even a roaming parliament that could spread national politics to the rest of the country!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more