Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Company ordered to pay £10k for misuse of 'architect' title


Middlesex-based Market Design & Build has been ordered to pay more than £10,000 in fines and costs - a record penalty - after being found guilty of misusing the title architect

Uxbridge Magistrates Court found the company had breached the 1997 Architects Act after referring to itself as architects and used the ARB’s logo on correspondence, despite not employing any architects.

Despite numerous warnings from the board, the company continued to refer to itself as architects on its correspondence, website, and advertising – including signage on company vehicles.

The court decided these were serious breaches and added that ‘offences like these impinge on architects who spend a minimum of seven years training and are subject to registration fees; when companies avoid such costs, they gain a big financial advantage’.

Market Design & Build entered guilty pleas to all five offences and the court imposed a fine of £1,667 on each of the five charges – a total of £8,335. In addition, the practice was ordered to pay a further £2,300 to ARB in legal costs.

In the same week another misuse of title case went to court in Wimbledon, south London.

Youno Kim, who was trading as Extension Architects, was slapped with a £1,000 fine and ordered to pay £1,000 in legal costs for using protected title.

Kim had described himself as a RIBA chartered architect on his website despite not being an architect.

A spokesperson from ARB’s professional standards department, said: ‘Only registered architects are legally allowed to use the title ‘architect’ in business or practice. The ARB takes seriously its duty to represent the interests of users of architects’ services. These prosecutions demonstrate the serious consequences for anyone that persists in misleading the public.’


Readers' comments (2)

  • It appears that Youno Kim is still trading as Extension Architects, and stating that he is a Chartered RIBA Architect on their website. How serious are ARB?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And now perhaps the ARB should remind registered architects that they're not members of the Board unless they're on the Board - or the ARB might find itself having to ask one of the Board members why all his architect partners are misrepresenting themselves as board members, when they're not - they're just registered architects, like the vast majority of the profession.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more