Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Chipperfield leads calls for Mac to be rebuilt


David Chipperfield has called for the Glasgow School of Art’s Mackintosh building to be declared a ‘monument of exceptional importance’ and rebuilt following the agreement of an ‘acceptable’ approach, as debate rages over its future

‘The issue is going to be money,’ Chipperfield added.

Chipperfield’s comments come as architects feud about a way forward for the Charles Rennie Mackintosh 1909 masterwork, which will be partially dismantled following a devastating blaze last month. 

Controversy was ignited by Alan Dunlop, architecture professor at Aberdeen’s Robert Gordon University, when he mooted the possibility of a competition for a new building. ‘I remain convinced that any attempt to replicate the building is vainglorious and that we should have faith in the future,’ Dunlop said.

‘A full public debate is warranted to properly consider the future for the site and what remains of the building. That includes the option of an international competition to design a new art school.’

An even more radical proposal was put forward by Glasgow School of Art honorary professor Ray McKenzie, who told ArtForum the Mac should be allowed to stand as ruins.

’The battered hulk of Mackintosh’s masterwork would stand as a silent witness to the value and the precariousness of history itself, and a potent symbol of the apocalyptic times in which we live,’ McKenzie said.

But Chipperfield, who redeveloped Berlin’s Neues Museum with Julian Harrap, said ‘the intention should be to develop a restoration guideline that defines a correct strategy and approach. It should be declared as a monument of exceptional importance and the decision in what way it should be rebuilt should be based on intellectual and technical criteria and opinion.’

‘The problem will be financial,’  Chipperfield added. ‘In my opinion, the cost issue should be set aside and defined as a result of an acceptable approach. On Neues Museum, there was no budget before we had developed the approach according to a framework that involved international restoration experts. The approach comes first, the costs come as a consequence.’

Chipperfield is not alone in calling for reconstruction. Charlie Hussey of Edinburgh-based Sutherland Hussey also urged a thorough rebuild.

‘I would propose a complete and faithful restoration, stone by stone, timber by timber,’ he said. ‘I have read with interest those calling for a new building … and those who have promoted the more nuanced approach of working with the ruins … but in this instance, I strongly reject both of these approaches. 

’In Japan, timber shrines and temples are regularly reconstructed; it is the preservation of the idea that is important and the faithfulness of the reconstruction that retains the authenticity.’

Tim Pitman, who completed his Part 2 at the Mac before going on to found Pitman Tozer, also called for reconstruction. ‘We will mourn the loss of a masterpiece far more than we will rue the missed opportunity of a contemporary replacement,’ he said. ’We should retain what we can, and rebuild the rest as faithfully as possible.’

‘Generally I’m not in favour of rebuilding,’ said Jane Meneely, senior associate at Glasgow-based Hypostyle Architects and a former Glasgow School of Art student. ‘However this is not a general situation. In this instance we should re-create what was there before – although maybe upgrade the seats in the lecture theatre.’

Glasgow city centre fire 648x486

Glasgow city centre fire 648x486

But not everyone was of the opinion that the Mac should be recreated. Several architects questioned the integrity of the building as home to the GSA following two significant fires.

Mike Stiff, founder of west London practice Stiff and Trevillion said: ‘Clearly two devastating fires demonstrate that the building was no longer fit for purpose as an art school.

‘If it were to be reconstructed how could it be used? Perhaps it should be a set of galleries and spaces that are tasked with exploring Mackintosh and Scottish Architecture. Its didactic heritage would be extended while reconstruction provides an opportunity to educate a generation of tradespeople in the skills and nuances of craftsmanship at the highest level.’

Gillian Stewart, director at Glasgow’s Michael Laird Architects, who studied design at the Glasgow School of Art in the 1980s also mentioned the risk of fire. ‘I do not think we should recreate a slavish copy of the original, with its timber and 1900s building techniques, which let’s face it, are rather flammable,’ she said.

‘For me it has to be something in between, something which perhaps replicates some very special spaces which capture the essence of the original building but do it within a 21st-century container, which is fit for purpose and for the future – and has sprinklers.’

Gerry Hogan, an architect at Glasgow-based Collective Architecture, warned against ‘leaping to a solution attractive in its simplicity, whether that be wholesale restoration or renewal’.

‘What moments can be re-captured, what function should a new building perform, what role can craft play, how do we respect Mackintosh’s great achievement while offering a bold and creative vision that is forward-looking?’ he asked. ‘Many more questions than this will need to be faced over the coming months.’

English Heritage maintenance project manager Lee Bilson said Mackintosh himself would respect the past but look to the future. Stressing that his views were his own, not his employer’s, Bilson said: ‘Public debate is needed before it is decided to rebuild. In my opinion any restoration would be an insubstantive copy as, principally for me, you can’t replicate the intricate foibles of Mackintosh’s built design.’

With all the available records it is possible to rebuild as if Mackintosh himself were arriving by horse and carriage for site inspections

Murray Kerr

But Denizen Works founder Murray Kerr, who studied at the Mac, said he believed a faithful rebuild was possible and suggested building on the ruins. ‘With all the available records it is possible to rebuild as if Mackintosh himself were arriving by horse and carriage for site inspections,’ he said. ‘Grafting a reconstruction on to the remnants that are still sound will embed the fire in the building’s history, gradually fading over the decades until it matches the patina of the original.’

The MP for Glasgow North East, Labour’s Paul Sweeney, told Parliament that the £25 million restoration job led by Page\Park in response to a fire in 2014 meant the building was understood better than ever before. 

‘The work of the architects and craftspeople has been extraordinary,’ he said. ‘We therefore have a critical mass of knowledge and understanding of this iconic building and its construction that makes it easier than ever before to restore Mackintosh’s original vision. They are geared up and more than ready to take on that challenge, and I will be making the strongest possible case that they should be allowed that chance.’ 

Page\Park declined to comment.

Martin Ashley, formerly a scholar at the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings, and founder of west London-based Martin Ashley Architects, agreed, and said reconstruction ‘could be achieved with craft, flair and courage’, adding: ‘While the building as we knew it may have gone, the digitally recorded design and many original artefacts remain intact.’

Scottish secretary David Mundell, meanwhile, appeared to suggest in Parliament that a rebuild was on the cards, with the political will to fund a reconstruction.

‘The UK Government previously gave £10 million to rebuild the school after the last fire, and we stand ready to help again,’ he said. ‘There was never a question about the need to rebuild and restore the building when tragedy struck four years ago. The situation is far worse after the weekend’s fire, but I hope we can start with that aim in mind.’

Whatever comes of the debate on its preservation, what is certain is that the future of the Mac is an emotive subject.

I am reminded of the Ship of Theseus, the philosophical question which explores identity, change, and the continuity of things

Graeme Nicholls

Graeme Nicholls, founder of Glasgow practice Graeme Nicholls Architects, said the Mac would live on in the work of the profession, and if rebuilt, should be allowed to evolve and change.

‘I am reminded of the Ship of Theseus, the philosophical question which explores identity, change, and the continuity of things,’ he said. ‘A ship is maintained over time with each component being replaced until every last plank, porthole and mast are different from the original. Is this still the same ship?

‘I would argue that the Mac’s continuing identity lies (in part) in the way that people who have visited, worked or studied in the building have constructed their own narratives about what it means for them.

‘The continuity of site, location, cultural identity, and use of the building also contribute to this identity at least as much as the provenance of its parts. I would like to see the Mac rebuilt as a working, evolving, building – which is what it has always been.’ 

Full size prototype of a mackintosh library bay. credit mcateer photo

Full size prototype of a mackintosh library bay. credit mcateer photo



Readers' comments (25)

  • Industry Professional

    Alan, Chris' comment is no more bizarre than your claim to know what Mackintosh would have wanted. If you truly do have an insight into the afterlife then it'd be useful to know what else CRM is saying...

    Also, useful to remember that being neither a Scot nor a Glaswegian validates your opinion on the Mack.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Industry Professional

    For those who want to see the Mack rebuilt, consider adding your name to this petition to rally support so that those like Dunlop don't give the impression that all architects want it torn down.


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sure, he's just asked me what is it with people who post their opinion anonymously and to tell them it's the Mac, not the Mack. When you bring in the k, you're starting on kintosh, which really is bizarre.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think a Neues Museum / Astley Castle type approach to the remaining fabric, with an eye towards history but primarily looking ahead at function is the only way forward for the Mac.

    Wholesale demolition for a completely new building isn't going to satisfy many. Based on photographs and footage of the charred remains, a 'faithful restoration' is likely to involve demolition and virtually a total rebuild. Restoration isn't an applicable word for the task.

    A pragmatic and careful approach to retaining what is leftover, whilst inserting new walls and additions, will preserve more of the original fabric and create opportunities which reflect the actual history of the building. The fires are now a part of the building's history and whatever is done should reflect and acknowledge that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Industry Professional

    Now, Alan, if that's not a patronising comment, I don't know what is. No wonder people think that the profession looks down upon those from outside it, if picking them up on spelling and/or grammar is your chosen weapon, rather than discussing their opinion.

    Mac, Mack, Mackintosh or, indeed any other way of titling the building is hardly the issue here, and picking someone up on a (perceived) error in spelling is not an intellectual argument.

    Again, your so-called opinion that you are somehow closer and more 'in tune' to the School and the building than other people is ugly and, even if it were to be true, it neither validates your opinion, nor invalidates theirs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh, Herbert has just chipped in and reminded me not to engage with flâneur types that don't give their names. He also wonders what's with the "tinder" image? "that seems a bit, well......... creepy"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Industry Professional

    Don't know, Alan, you'd need to ask AJ or CIS...that's the stock photo and username which comes up for anyone who accesses AJ via the CIS. Hence why if you look at the profile you'll see 'industry professional' has made thousands of comments on this website over many, many years. Not one person, I'm afraid.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I did not know that for I've never posted a comment anonymously, on any website that was critical of anyone's opinion without having the courage to add my name.

    To answer your question, and take you initial comment more seriously than it deserves. My opinion on what Mackintosh would do is not a consequence of having a hot line to the ever after but instead is based on a study of his writing, sketchbooks, letters to Francis Newbery and his lectures. Particularly his tour of Italy and his contribution to the debate surrounding the rebuilding of St Mark's Campanile in 1902.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Industry Professional

    Thank you, Alan. I appreciate your reasonable, respectful response to my initial comment. I still don't agree that Mackintosh's opinion should have any bearing on the future of the building, however: an architect is not custodian of a building in perpetuity, once their design is complete they do not get to 'safeguard' their wishes.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • MacKenzie Architects

    The original Mac Building was a fantastic solution for a very low price, at a time when almost all public' buildings were over-decorated wedding cakes.
    The reason the Mac Building is so loved by Artists and Architects -especially those who studied within its myriad spaces- was that it was an excellent functioning building.
    The reason the rest of the city and the country loved the building was because of their pride in the Architect himself and what he achieved despite lack of recognition from the people who should have been commissioning him.

    I would hazard a guess and say that a new competition for the site, would produce nothing as conclusively triumphant as CRM's design. Were we to submit a scheme ourselves, it would be a stone for stone rebuild, with credit and copyrights acknowledged.

    The Holl Building opposite -which one an international shortlist competition- I do not believe is a success .......

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 102050results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more