Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Aukett's Croydon Gateway plans move forward

  • Comment
Croydon council is 'on the verge' of seizing land at Croydon Gateway in south London to take forward Michael Aukett Architects' much-maligned project there, the AJ has learned.

According to the architect, there are 'a couple' of conditions for it to deal with before the local authority can wrest control of the site from its major landowner, Stanhope.

It is anticipated that the Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) procedure can move forward swiftly and it is thought that this could happen as early as next year.

The Croydon project has been beset by a variety of political problems throughout its turbulent history. Aukett's scheme has the backing of the council, but developer Stanhope owns the majority of the land.

Stanhope is trying to take forward a rival application spearheaded by Foster and Partners. It is likely that the developer, led by seasoned property professional Stuart Lipton, would legally contest any CPO (AJ 08.01.04).

The council has previously criticised Stanhope's proposals on the quality of its design. The local authority claimed that Stanhope's plans were not a 'comprehensive redevelopment of the Croydon Gateway site'.

The local authority also stated that the developer's planning application 'fails to demonstrate that the proposed development would provide landmark buildings of high quality design and originality' (AJ 03.08.05).

by Rob Sharp

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs