Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Alsop tower faces reduction after Squire and Partners cuts its skyscraper down to size - images

  • Comment
Will Alsop's proposed skyscraper near the City of London (above) could be facing a trim in height after Squire and Partners was forced to cut five floors from its own neighbouring scheme.

The move to cut down the building's size is understood to have followed an intervention during the planning process by English Heritage, which was concerned about the tower's effect on nearby conservation areas.

Squire's reduction from 44 storeys to 39 (below) looks likely to spell the end for Alsop's plan for a 142m-tall skyscraper, with a more modest tower now likely to be built.

Even Terry Farrell's proposed Eagle House development, which currently stands at 34 storeys, could be lopped down in size.

Squire's scheme, backed by developer Derwent London, is one of many proposed towers on City Road, which is now seeing a glut of major developments in the offing, due to its close proximity to the City.

However, it is thought that English Heritage may have issues with the influx of towers in the area, claiming the site, which runs along the northern fringe of the City, past Old Street and up towards Islington, is not suitable for high-rise developments.

The amendment by Squire and Partners means the total number of units in the residential tower will be cut from 250 to 225, with the affordable housing being reduced from 79 to 66.

In a statement referring to the Squires tower, English Heritage said: 'English Heritage welcomes the demolition of the unattractive buildings on this prominent site by Old Street roundabout, and believes its redevelopment offers a good opportunity to improve the area.

'However, the current proposals for the site would actually harm rather than enhance the area.'

by Richard Vaughan

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.