Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Allies and Morrison reveals rival Garden Bridge proposal


Allies and Morrison has drawn up an alternative proposal for a Garden Bridge in London: converting Blackfriars Bridge into a tree-lined walkway

The Southwark-based firm, which won AJ120 Practice of the Year last year, came up with the idea in response to ongoing debate about the Garden Bridge - the highly contentious ‘planted’ footbridge designed by Thomas Heatherwick and backed by Joanna Lumley.

The practice, which has its headquarters close to the proposed link between Temple and the South Bank, admitted that the ’intention behind the bridge [was] noble’ but that ’widespread concerns about cost, ownership and appropriateness [were] hard to ignore’.

The Garden Bridge will cost at least £175 million, with a chunk of that coming from the taxpayer in the form of funds committed by Transport for London and the Department of Transport.

But it is already almost a year behind schedule and the procurement process has been repeatedly questioned.

‘Rethought and slightly readjusted, Blackfriars can accommodate a public garden of similar size to the proposed Garden Bridge,’ according to a post on Allies and Morrison’s website.

The transformation of Blackfriars Bridge could be achieved by having one single 14m-wide pavement on the west side of the bridge, to allow the creation of a ‘brilliant pedestrianised garden’ with ‘dramatic views of St Paul’s and the City to the east and Westminster to the west.’

The architectural firm describes how the suggested Blackfriars Bridge Garden ‘does not require extensive construction and can be delivered at a fraction of the cost of a new bridge.’

It adds: ‘A garden over the Thames is a tantalising vision, but it’s one that does not require an entirely new bridge. We could simply use one that is already there.’

What do you think of this proposal? Leave your comments below


Readers' comments (5)

  • definitely makes more sense than the 'garden bridge'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Brilliant. London should do this regardless of what happens with the other one.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • MacKenzie Architects

    London has loads of parks and squares, with lots of beautiful trees in them.
    As far as I am concerned, the great thing about a river is you can see both sides, and full buildings from a distance. You can also see down at least to the next bridge.

    I would rather see no trees between the river banks. If you gotta have a garden bridge -and it could be beautiful- make it bushes only pleeze.

    Besides, if you want a technical reason, the river wind will bend these trees, and they'll have less depth for rooting.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would be very interested to see the tree that can grow out of solid structure as shown in A&M's photoshop fantasy. What's wrong with spending this money on overhauling the current disgraceful and intimidating walkway along the north bank of the Thames in the City. This proposal should go the way of the other garden monstrosity and be quickly and quietly forgotten.....Peter Sheard - Landscape Architect

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "Garden island", anyone?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.