Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

AJ’s alternative Stirling Prize jury declares Glasgow College winner

  • 1 Comment

The AJ’s alternative judging panel has named Reiach and Hall and Michael Laird Architects’ City of Glasgow College the project it thinks should win the Stirling Prize

Having visited all six projects shortlisted for this year’s Stirling Prize, the AJ’s panel – which included Invisible Studio founder Piers Taylor, developer Martyn Evans, ex-AOC participation specialist Daisy Froud and architecture editor Laura Mark – met to make their decision last week.

Although wowed by the detailing of Caruso St John’s Newport Street Gallery, the judges thought that Glasgow College ‘showed how much difference a good, skilled architect can make to an unambitious brief’.

Evans said: ‘When you really understood the story of how it got made, what an immense amount of work the architects had to do, you felt the institution was being challenged by the building, but in a way that felt very natural.

Taylor added: ‘The client could have just got a middle-ranking practice which could have just given them a commercial building, and they would have been quite happy. Every move beyond just giving that client an ordinary building was driven by the architect.’

In the alternative jury’s view, the project saw off competition from Herzog & de Meuron’s Blavatnik School of Government, Loyn & Co’s Modernist Outhouse, WilkinsonEyre’s Weston Library, and dRMM’s Trafalgar Place.

But will the AJ’s winner be the same as the jury’s? We’ll have to wait until tonight when the official announcement is made at 66 Portland Place to find out.

The AJ's Alternative Judging Panel

The AJ’s Alternative Judging Panel

Watch the AJ’s exclusive documentary to find out what the judges thought of all this year’s finalists

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Haven't been there but I hope the real jury will consider your rationale. A convincing argument.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.