Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

- While conservationists attack decision not to list Liverpool

  • Comment
The chairman of the Liverpool Preservation Trust has attacked Unesco's decision not to put Liverpool on its World Heritage 'in danger' list.

Wayne Colquhuon described Unesco's conclusion that 'the outstanding universal value of Liverpool's Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site is not threatened by the impact of new development' as a 'big disappointment'.

He said: 'The central core of the World Heritage Site is being eroded. The Three Graces at the pier head are being swamped by modern developments.

'It is civic vandalism,' added Colquhuon.

The reprieve means Liverpool joins Tower Bridge and Westminster, both of which learned yesterday (26 June) that they too would remain off the in danger list for at least another year.

Culture Minister David Lammy said: 'Much has been done to ensure that redevelopment respects Liverpool's magnificent cultural heritage, particularly through planning control based on a keener understanding of townscape characteristics and sense of place, and this will continue.'

Unesco's decision follows a visit to the city in October 2006, during which the impact of planning proposals - including 3XN's National Museum of Liverpool - was reviewed.

by Max Thompson

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs