Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Matthew McKenna



Recent activity

Comments (12)

  • Comment on: Cheesegrater’s public realm completes

    Matthew McKenna's comment 19 August, 2014 10:14 am

    In this day and age you'd think that a purpose built "Accessible Entrance" on a new building wouldn't be shoved around the side of the building - it probably isn't best practice with regards to the Equality Act either. - Also wouldn't "Lift" have sufficed?

  • Comment on: Bogus architect slapped with £1,000 fine

    Matthew McKenna's comment 12 August, 2014 12:05 pm

    I disagree that £1,000 is the maximum fine - isn't this is Fraud by False Representation?


    Whilst they may not have yet profited from the fraud, their is clear intent to break the law too and is not even slightly defensible as a mistake (as one might argue when they call themselves an Architect but are not).

  • Comment on: Ex-construction minister 'shocked' by Hadid's Qatar stance

    Matthew McKenna's comment 28 July, 2014 10:43 am

    Nick Raynsford was the Shadow Minister for Housing and Construction... I would be interested to know if he ever put pressure on the opposition to extend the CDM duties to include construction work outside of Britain? After all It seems a little late to be making “demands” now.

  • Comment on: Growing pressure on RIBA over 'dismissed' Israel motion

    Matthew McKenna's comment 23 July, 2014 11:40 am

    Whilst we probably agree for the most part on many simpler and less contentious political issues at a national level (particularly those that are included within the stated RIBA objectives - such as lobbying government for quality housing); I certainly never joined the RIBA expecting them to make any contentious political comment at an international level. I’m not even sure the RIBA is politically astute enough to have a motion here even if they have the powers.

    I do however believe the RIBA need to be clear here as the Palestine Architects Society seem to imply that the RIBA either supports them or is against them.

    If the RIBA are to have these sorts of political positions then more transparency is needed by many other groups. For example does the Palestine Architects Society support Hamas?

  • Comment on: Should the ARB be kept? Last chance to put your opinions to government

    Matthew McKenna's comment 29 May, 2014 2:12 pm

    The structure and organisation to the ARB and RIBA is so drastically different that combining their roles is not simple. An important thing to consider is:

    The RIBA 'works for/supports' Chartered Architects
    The ARB 'protects the consumer'.

    To ensure that the consumer is protected the core functions of the ARB cannot be under the control of the profession. Therefore if the functions of the ARB were undertook by the RIBA a new department would effectively be needed with a majority representation of non architects, or otherwise the RIBA would effectively be carrying out a different role as it would be seen to be operating in the interests of Architects.

View all comments