Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Mark Marshall

Recent activity

Comments (6)

  • Comment on: Brexit provides the opportunity to rebalance anti-retrofit VAT rules

    Mark Marshall's comment 10 January, 2019 11:55 am

    Completely agree with Jeremy & David. It is possible to work within EU rules and enjoy all the other benefits of the Union. And that adjusting / balancing the VAT rate is so important, especially in a country with limited space for new build and a great building stock gently decaying.

  • Comment on: Brexit provides the opportunity to rebalance anti-retrofit VAT rules

    Mark Marshall's comment 8 January, 2019 11:42 am

    Not sure the VAT reasoning is correct. France applies c.20% VAT to new build and around 9% to refurb projects. So the EU regs argument seems flawed. Another case of the straight banana?

  • Comment on: Architects sign letter to May outlining Brexit’s threat to profession

    Mark Marshall's comment 25 October, 2018 10:08 am

    Thank you Piers. Paul Finch, rather than telling people exercising a right to protest to 'get a grip', could you define reasons why Brexit would be of benefit to our profession? It has been 2 years since the vote, and nothing about the negotiations nor their outcome is being reported as positive. As argued above, architecture firms will lose a diversity of staff from different cultures, building material costs are rising rapidly and uncertainty is slowing construction. Where is the upside? Your comments about other country's unemployment being due a single currency is highly debatable, but in any case Britain is not part of the single currency. Though admittedly the value of the pound does equal that of the euro after the Brexit vote.

  • Comment on: Competition: Hertfordshire housing

    Mark Marshall's comment 6 June, 2018 4:09 pm

    The Gov.uk notice for the Bulbourne development site it suggests the value of the contract (architect's fees) is £10K - £25K. The project brief describes the potential budget to be approx. £1.5M. At £10K the fee percentage would be 0.6%, at £25K it would be 1.65%. Is it possible to provide any sort of design service at that level of fee?

  • Comment on: Designs for living: the house as home

    Mark Marshall's comment 4 December, 2015 11:25 am

    Great article, it seems to balance the highly specific and the inherently generic attitudes that are needed in house design. The specific can create interest and individuality, while the generic will promote more widespread acceptance (from both developers and purchasers) along with a collective impression of 'homeliness'. After all, most of us still aspire to a version of the Pooters' house.

View all comments

Job of the week

AJ Jobs