Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Judith Martin

Recent activity

Comments (27)

  • Comment on: Concrete: do architects have their heads in the sand?

    Judith Martin's comment 16 January, 2019 7:25 pm

    It's probably about 20 years since I found - from, I think, Blue Circle's own information - that a tonne of cement produces a tonne of CO2. That makes it all the more important to preserve the embodied energy in buildings like Preston Bus Station (saved) or the Tricorn Centre (lost). A downturn in the cycle of popularity is really not enough. Think of the amount of concrete in the Aylesbury Estate.

  • Comment on: Jewish peers call for Adjaye’s Holocaust Memorial to be dropped

    Judith Martin's comment 3 October, 2018 12:04 pm

    I couldn't agree more with the peers but - pace the summer's Labour party difficulties - have felt unable to express an opinion. Now those with a rock solid involvement have spoken out, perhaps this damaging scheme could be ditched. London is not Berlin, where Peter Eisenman's elegant memorial, and the many lesser ones, are essential.
    While anti semitism in the UK is clearly still real, education would be a far better use of the money.

  • Comment on: Revealed: Thomas Heatherwick was founding member of Garden Bridge client body

    Judith Martin's comment 8 December, 2017 5:19 pm

    Could Sarah Sands' reluctance to report on any of this have anything to do with the fact that the current editor of the Evening Standard is alleged to have invested personally in the Garden Bridge?
    If Thomas Heatherwick were actually an architect this would surely be a case for RIBA disciplinary action.

  • Comment on: Destroyed 17th century ceiling in Bristol prompts calls for new protections

    Judith Martin's comment 11 September, 2017 12:46 pm

    HE should at least say what has actually happened. The ceiling hasn't 'been removed', it has been smashed up. 'Been removed' is weasel words designed to gloss over a failure to protect. It is possible to remove a ceiling - think of Croome Court (now NT) decades ago, where ceilings ended up in the US. This could have been removed, and maybe sold. But Anna Sullivan is right. Far better would have been to leave it in situ and watch admiring parents express delight and surprise at their student offspring's new accommodation - at an enhanced price, naturally.

  • Comment on: Ethel Day: AJ student survey shows women are put off practice at university

    Judith Martin's comment 11 July, 2017 12:09 pm

    @heavenairport - Sorry to keep on 'splaining but in the absence of an ironic typeface, which Nwola Uduku and I both maybe needed, it's the difference between shocking and surprising. So these findings are shocking but not surprising.

View all comments