Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Jim Cuthbertson

Recent activity

Comments (6)

  • Comment on: Leaked emails reveal extraordinary row between Mac chiefs

    Jim Cuthbertson's comment 9 September, 2019 1:00 pm

    I agree with Alan Dunlop..something wrong with the governance here . JIm Cuthbertson (retired Glasgow Architect) still interested at 77! (cuthj@aol.com)




  • Comment on: Sad demise for Glasgow practice as 27 lose their jobs

    Jim Cuthbertson's comment 22 March, 2019 1:53 pm

    very sad to hear of ADF demise............Jim Cuthbertson

  • Comment on: RIBA slams Hackitt’s post-Grenfell review as ‘major missed opportunity’

    Jim Cuthbertson's comment 18 May, 2018 10:24 am

    Stop building high rise flats with one staircase - stop telling tenants to stay in their flats if the fire alarm sounds. If structure still sound reconfigure and replan Grenfell by installing two new staircases , one of which is designated primarily for fire service use , including fire service instructing escape if appropriate- (ie therefore three in total)

  • Comment on: Grenfell Tower inquiry turns down RIBA's offer to help

    Jim Cuthbertson's comment 22 November, 2017 10:13 pm

    What was the architects' brief at Grenfell? appointed by the client? or contractor? For both design and construction drawings? And inspections? Was there a Clerk of Works ? Is the layout of one staircase and the rule of "stay in your flat if the fire alarm goes off" common practice throughout England (Wales?)for a high multi-storey block of flats or is this a comparatively new idea? And finally are such buildings still being built?
    There are lots of questions which architects are best prepared to answer over and above those within the client organisations' knowledge of those acting and while it seems strange that the RIBA has been rejected as a core participant it might be the case that the expert witnesses for all the Client Design and Construction parties have common views I fear this will be unlikely. Perhaps the RIBA will be called upon to offer expert witnesses and the "core participant " rejection might in that case be more appropriate

  • Comment on: Is there an anti-Celtic bias within the Stirling Prize?

    Jim Cuthbertson's comment 2 November, 2017 9:09 pm

    I agree with Alan Dunlop ...........the pier is engineering and the architecture unexciting - a disappointing winner for the Stirling Prize. Jim Cuthbertson (retired RIBA FRIAS, MRIAI,)

View all comments

Job of the week

AJ Jobs