Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

Jay Merrick

Recent activity

Comments (8)

  • Comment on: Graeme Nicholls reveals proposal for O-shaped Glasgow housing scheme

    Jay Merrick's comment 21 May, 2020 1:22 pm

    So sorry to be pedantic, but the plan of this project is not shaped "like a broken O". Nor, as per the text, is it a case of "two horseshoe-plan blocks". Horseshoes have quite different, rather bowed plans. It's perfectly obvious that the plans of the two blocks are two Us, with their open ends facing eachother. And is there something snooty about the plan? If we borrow Nancy Mitford's terms for the distinction between the upper and middle classes in 1955, the plan of Graeme Nicholls scheme is very U indeed. Jay Merrick

  • Comment on: Morris + Co draws up office tower next to US Embassy

    Jay Merrick's comment 26 July, 2019 10:16 am

    There are moments, Jeeves, when one asks oneself, do trousers matter? One feels the same way about towers. I've met Mr Morris, and he's a very decent cove, and bally handy with pencils, rulers, and sheets of paper. But, really, that isn't a tower, unless it's a tower that's been sat on by something extremely heavy, and probably very bad-tempered. Jay Merrick

  • Comment on: The Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission’s measures will create a shambles

    Jay Merrick's comment 9 July, 2019 9:19 am

    Paul is right about the beauty red-herring. It's a simple and plainly evident fact that most planning authorities, including those in cities, struggle to judge what is good or bad architecture. It is slightly chilling to learn from Mr Boys Smith that ‘we need to move democracy upstream from development-control to plan-making.’ Translation: the government obviously requires an even bigger fan for the architectural shit to hit. In this situation, the definition of architectural beauty will obviously become a free-for-all, a kind of deadly civic satire, a salient example of which was Mayor Boris Johnson's contribution to the design of the excellent new London Bridge Station. The obviously pointless and rather crude metal gubbins connecting the canopies were a bitterly conceded sop to his original demand for a single massive overarching canopy over the platforms. He also suggested that gargoyles might be added to the street elevations. Jay Merrick

  • Comment on: Whitehall’s confusion about architecture explains the beauty parade

    Jay Merrick's comment 14 November, 2018 12:31 pm

    The civic furniture of the past has often been architecturally striking (though not necessarily indisputably beautiful); and more likely to be so when, despite being extruded from the trajectories of earlier architecture, it has been clearly a product of its particular time. We might think this of buildings as different as the Mortuary Temple of Hatshepsut, St Stephen's Walbrook, Soane's House, Crystal Palace, Fallingwater, the Sainsbury Centre, and the Kolumba Museum. The difficulty with assigning beauty as the guiding light for development in the 21st century is that, because of its protean aspects and definitions, beauty can only be presented and discussed in a reductive manner; and this is likely to produce, at best, "beautiful" architecture that stolidly repeats that past rather than addresses the socio-urban conditions, aka most lives, of its time. There is quite enough utterly dreadful, pimped-up contemporary architecture without sending Light Brigades of fatally conceived, essentially neo-historic buildings into the Balaclava of Britain's planning and architectural failures. Mr Scruton is reported to have said that women are only harrassed by ugly men. Leaving aside the fact that this is so obviously untrue (see: Sir Kenneth Clark, Alan Clark, Bill Clinton, ad infinitum) isn't it most likely that the government's new commission can only lead to our towns, cities, and countryside being increasingly harrassed by the architectural equivalents of the Night of the Living Dead? For decades, successive governments have demonstrated no decisively engaged interest in architecture's contribution to society. Will the new commission be anything more than yet another headline-only contribution to the urban status woe? Jay Merrick

  • Comment on: RIBA poll takes its toll – what we learned from a turbulent election

    Jay Merrick's comment 29 August, 2018 11:13 am

    Having attempted to watch and listen to the short speeches given by the three candidates (which the Riba and AJ put online) I found myself descending into an almost narcoleptic condition. None of the candidates seemed able to communicate any ideas that were distinctly interesting in a distinctly engaging way. There was a pervasive sense of safety-first defensiveness and box-ticking in their presentations, a verbal intertia worthy of the uniquely turgid Chris Grayling that must surely be erased if the Riba is to communicate more effectively right across its membership, and to the public. This is not a matter for its PR department, or simply generating increased, and pointlessly quantifiable, column-inches of publicity. It's a question of whether the President and the Riba's key officers are able to communicate their ideas and narratives for internal or external audiences more effectively. It's perhaps also an ethical matter. In essence, one acts ethically by acknowledging the fundamental importance of community existence, in which personal and singular ideas and intentions must always be considered in the light of a plurality of other ideas and intentions. After the rather shambolic run-up to the election, one must hope that the management of the Riba can pursue this ideal more intently and effectively. Jay Merrick

View all comments