Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Windows on the world of ventilation

  • Comment
letters

Forgive me for thinking that I'm missing something, but did not Dr Birkbeck, speaking in the House of Commons c.1840 (in his surmise on providing proper ventilation into dwellings) state that doors are for admitting people, windows are for letting in light and that other means should be employed for ventilation? In plain speaking, Dr Birkbeck clearly stated that after much research it has been found that windows are wholly unsuitable for providing safe and controlled means of ventilation.

Adrian Leaman's article (aj 4.3.99) makes, in my opinion, the erroneous premise that people want to control their environment by constantly opening or closing windows. I would like to see the evidence that unequivocally supports such an assertion, given that Leaman's article itself highlights the dichotomy whereby one person's action to open or close a window would upset the apparent comfort of others in the same environment, notwithstanding security problems, sound intrusion and the other defects noted in his article.

People's comfort is important, and such a comfort zone is as indicated within the constraints of the comfort envelope of a psychometric chart. The variable nature of an open window cannot provide constancy of comfort. Furthermore, evidence exists to demonstrate that the replenishment of air, via an open window, is neither necessary or, for that matter, desired, as full control cannot be achieved. Therefore designing windows for ventilation is irrational as well as impractical.

As I understand it, termites in the Western deserts of Australia can control their environment to within a few percentage degrees. As we approach the third millennium, surely is it not beyond the wit of man to devise a means of providing safe, controlled and adequate natural (non-mechanical) ventilation without the obvious inadequacies of windows.

Peter Semenenko

By email

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.