Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Wilkey takes umbrage at AJ's Koolhaas article

  • Comment
Letters

I write concerning gross inaccuracies in Zoe Blackler's report 'Koolhaas sues accuser's legal team to recoup £500K costs' (AJ 24.1.02) that are highly damaging to me personally.

She describes me as a 'discredited' expert witness. This is inaccurate, prejudicial and defamatory. The matter has been reported to the disciplinary committee of the RIBA, the ARB and the Academy of Experts. I will vigorously defend myself against all allegations made against me in my capacity as an expert witness, should either committee decide to hear the matter. Neither has not yet done so, let alone found against me.

She also states that Mr Justice Jacob 'slammed' my report. This is not true. He made comments about my evidence in court over which I am taking legal advice in respect of a possible complaint to the Lord Chancellor's Department.

Thirdly, the article alleges there are 'suggestions' I work as a full-time expert witness. This is not the case. My time is evenly divided between expert witness work and architectural practice on the other.

Finally, it was made clear to Miss Blackler that I am vigorously defending my position against these allegations and this was ignored in her article.

Michael D J Wilkey, London EC1

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.