Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

What's the Mather with ethics and preservation?

  • Comment
letters

With reference to your news feature ('abk slams Mather's Keble college extension', aj 13.1.00), it is hard to believe that a respectable architect of Mather's calibre did not find it correct to correspond with abk on a matter affecting abk's listed building.

We would have thought that is the first step required of architects when involved in work affecting a colleague's listed building.

What has happened to ethics? And what has happened to English Heritage, which listed abk's building? What is the client's position on this?

We are incensed by this attitude of Mather's, whom we respect and admire. Whatever happens, we are not revising that very beautiful drawing of abk's plan because of Mather's plans. We did that drawing ourselves when we worked with abk.

Antoine E Raffoul, Raffoul Darrer Architects, London W4

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.