Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

What industry figures want: Andy Jobling

  • Comment

Andy Jobling, technical manager, Levitt Bernstein

This consultation has correctly identified the difficulties faced by the building industry when Building Regulations are amended piecemeal. This often introduces conflicts between different parts of the regulations which are not updated synchronously.

The current proposal is to update the regulations on a three-year cycle. We welcome this, but would prefer a longer interval. If you consider that even a modest-sized project lasts three years, then architects would start every new project designing to a new set of Building Regulations.

There is growing opinion that Construction (Design Management) Regulations sit uncomfortably on their own and the Health and Safety Executive does not have the resources to enforce them. They could become another section of the Building Regulations – which, after all, arose entirely to control public health and safety in the built environment.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs