Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Well, at least the site works on my computer

  • Comment
AJ+.COLUMN

I have mentioned the Jack Schofield test of website design. It is whether you can adjust the size of type using your own browser.The kindly archipersons at ALS remind me that there is another acid test. It is whether the site fits on your screen neatly.They write: 'An increasing number of sites are too wide to display on an 800x600 screen or even on 17inch 1024x768 screens.Designers seem to be setting their pages to fixed widths so that text will not wrap to the screen width'.

Absolutely right: it is happening a lot.

Apart from those few sites which are intended to scroll sideways, the reason it should not happen is simple:

ergonomics.You get pissed off pretty quickly when you have to move the page from the side just to read the last few words on every line. It is not just 17 inch screens, it happens on 19 inch and larger screens too.

I am no HTML expert but I am not sure whether it is necessarily to do with fixing widths. I recently quizzed a web designer about this and he said that on the oversized side-to-side site he had screwed up, sorry, designed, he had made the page width relative, not absolute, and what else could he do about it? He concluded with a devastating line which will go down in 21st century cultural history, along with 'I'm on the bus'. It is: 'Well it works on my computer.'

The conventional answer is and always has been that a site has to work on everybody else's computer.

Otherwise why bother building a site?

It is just that making sure this does, in fact, happen takes more trouble and time, and probably involves spending a bit of dosh in having the checks made.

But designing a site for just one browser or one screen size or one operating system is not so much arrogant as completely stupid.

In the words of the great Schofield, it is 'not just cretinous, it is poisonous. It is harming the idea at the heart of the Web.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs