Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

We should spread blame for component flaws

  • Comment
Letters

I read with interest Paul Hyett's article (AJ 1.7.99) about architects' liability for the work of specialist subcontractors and the response (8.7.99) from Sarah Peck on behalf of insurers - no doubt good advice for individual architects. The point which needs to be made, however, is that where a building or any of its component parts seriously fails, it is the industry as a whole which, in the eyes of the client, is responsible and should be liable. It is no use for architects or other designers to abdicate responsibility and stand in a line with everyone pointing the finger at one unfortunate individual. The principle reason why more and more clients are moving to design-build is that it is a means of attaching liability for the product, i.e. the building, at the door of a single party. Many design-build contractors, however, forget that they are responsible for the design, especially at the end of the project and in the defects-liability period. If the design team and the contractor are not willing to jointly take responsibility for the performance of specialist components, they quite simply should not be specified or used.

John A Harris, Director, Alex Sayer Ltd, West Sussex

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.