Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

We must judge each building by its merits

  • Comment
LETTERS

Having wrongly assumed that someone of greater authority than me might well have reacted in the letter columns to Andrew Mead's excellent account of conservation of 1930s properties (AJ 7.6.01), I now feel I should comment.

Fundamentally, the article highlights the John Winter philosophy - the need for a judicious degree of flexibility in conservation, avoiding over-adulation for the period, particularly when this is at the owner's expense.

As a junior assistant to Herbert Rowse of Liverpool when I was feeling my way into the profession before the war, I recall him saying: 'These Modernist chaps are breaking new ice. They are brave indeed - they are doing a good job producing works of art, pointing the way to the future. But take my advice: if you respect your client, move cautiously from the traditional.'

He cited Maxwell Fry as a Modernist with traditional authority. 'Our buildings must last, ' he added.

I sometimes get the feeling that some 1930s listed buildings are not really worth the trouble.

Richard Brown, Poole, Dorset

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

ARCHITECTURE JOBS BY EMAIL

Do you want the latest jobs emailed to you?
Sign up for job alerts.

AJ Jobs