Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Unfair charges laid at the door of car users

  • Comment
letters

Phil Bixby (AJ 21.4.05) recognises that cycling, walking and public transport are not always free choices for a great number of elderly and those from lowincome households, and yet then seeks to condemn those who use their cars as somehow responsible for undermining their lack of personal mobility.

Ironically, this is just spiteful nonsense masquerading as a defence of poorer sections of the community. It is also a misrepresentation of reality.

At the moment, for example, the good mayor of London is threatening to increase the congestion charge as a means of inconveniencing more people to get out of their cars. Funnily enough, the very people who will be priced out are those in low-income brackets; and the numbers of people consequently having to cram themselves on our inadequate public transport provision will not make the journey any more comfortable for those pensioners, children and young people for whom Bixby seems to be the unelected representative.

I am not a campaigner for or against the congestion charge, neither am I what Bixby might parody as 'others in love with their cars'. Surely, the main thing is to campaign for a decent transport system, not the sort of sectarian system of robbing Peter to pay Paul that Bixby seems to be advocating?

Toby Andrews, Wood Green

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.