Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We use cookies to personalise your experience; learn more in our Privacy and Cookie Policy. You can opt out of some cookies by adjusting your browser settings; see the cookie policy for details. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.


  • Comment

Tory veteran John Gummer has outlined an astonishing raft of proposals that could transform planning if the Conservatives win the next election.

The former cabinet minister - who chairs Tory leader David Cameron's Quality of Life task force - revealed the plans at Robert Adam Architects' annual dinner last week.

The changes would see a culture shift in both planning process and procedure, freeing up planners to work on major projects.

Under Gummer's recommendations, the public would not be required to go through the traditional planning system for work on domestic properties built since 1945.

He plans to turn the system on its head. Homeowners would no longer have to win planning permission - all they would have to do is lodge a statement of intent with the local authority.

If this statement proved unacceptable, planners would have the right to veto a scheme only if it was 'truly dreadful'.

The assumption would be that homeowners could do what they wanted to their own properties, a right that would, Gummer claimed, 'civilise estates'.

'Some 60 per cent of the work of most planning departments is with proposals to add to or to change houses that have been built since 1945, and I don't think there are many of these estates that wouldn't benet from a bit of eccentricity, ' he said.

'What I'm going to propose is the abolition of the need for all planning consents on any estate built since 1945. So if you want to build a carport or extend your house you can simply lodge a statement of intent.

'If it's dreadful, the local authority can intervene, but it has to stop you, and it has to pay for it.

'If you ask, 'Has it been worth all the effort that has been gone to control carports on estates?', you would have to say, 'No'.

'What we are suggesting is that we change to proper planning, ' Gummer added.

'And we can't do that unless we release planners from the stupidity that is development control.' Gummer also outlined a planned revolution in building regs. 'We would abolish all building regulations, and set standards instead, ' he said. 'So you tell architects that they have to achieve, say, a thermal efciency of X, or a grey water system, but you don't tell them how do to it, ' he said.

Unsurprisingly, the Twentieth Century Society (C20) hit out at the suggestion.

'Development control is not 'stupidity', ' director Catherine Croft said. 'It's about making sure that changes respect the rights of neighbours - making sure that one person's selshness or thoughtlessness doesn't blight someone else's home.

'It's often not exciting stuff but it's about stopping things that can have a really big impact on people's lives, ' she added.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

Discover architecture career opportunities. Search and apply online for your dream job.
Find out more