Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

There's no revolution with Murphy's law

  • Comment
Letters

Richard Murphy's housing scheme at Cramond is fine and Murphy is a competent architect, but to make wild comments, as he did at the RIAS convention, that his new design 'might change the face of British suburban housing at a stroke' is comical if not ridiculous (AJ 24.5.01).

In density and orientation the building is not that different from the post-war council flats one sees around Britain. The only thing that prevents them from being in the revolutionary realm of great housing is a lack of care and maintenance. Given those same conditions, Murphy's housing will be as good or as bad; let's hope he has rich enough tenants to fulfil his dream and sustain the buildings. The best thing going for it, like any building, is its location.

To revolutionize suburbia?

He is speculating that people do not walk around Cramond - a gentle walk down by the River Almond will surely tell you that you can't really do anything radical there since it already exists.

Gunther Pelsi, by e-mail

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.