Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

The lesson of Newham's error of judgment

  • Comment
letters

Being involved in the setting up of an architect/developer competition for a significant local town centre mixed development, I am grateful to Nicholas Boyarsky for explaining what went wrong at Newham (AJ 5.2.04).

The unanswered question seems to be why the judging proceeded at all when several of the key advertised participants were absent.

Hoping for the best is rarely a successful strategy. Standing up for a principle is usually uncomfortable, but sometimes, as in this case, it might have avoided protracted agony.

Colin James, Pinsley Orchard, Witney, Oxon

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.