Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

The Establishment isn't what it used to be . . .

  • Comment

In congratulating Norman Foster on his peerage and Will Alsop on his OBE, one can only wonder at the sea change which seems to have taken place in the relationship between public opinion and the architectural profession. It is not so very long ago that architects were the automatic target for every saloon-bar bore in Britain, criticised as solely responsible for every imaginable ill in our run-down cities, from high-rise slum housing to ugly civic development schemes. The people who had been praised to the skies in the 50s and 60s for their work in rebuilding Britain were now seen as vandals, intent on replacing the well-loved past with a second- rate future. The Prince of Wales' Hampton Court speech famously encapsulated a general public mood.

By that time (1984), the profession had already begun to change as the one-size-fits-all ethos gave way to more sympathetic forms of architecture, and it was unfortunate, to say the least, that the very people at the forefront of advocating new and better environments became the targets for the worst level of criticism. That, in part, explains why many so many of our better architects found themselves seeking (and getting) work overseas.

But while the profession may have been criticised or even reviled for a decade, the honours system proved to be flexible in recognising that the talented in every generation deserve reward, whatever temporary critical fashions might suggest. The leaders of the architectural avant-garde have thus become the pillars of the new establishment -an establishment which in traditional British fashion has found no difficulty in itself evolving in its criteria and scope. Now, it seems, architects can do no wrong. It would not be surprising if a host of honours were to be awarded as a consequence of the wave of brave new millennium buildings coming our way. As for the Prince, he seems to be embracing the new in a constructive way - who would have imagined that his institute would host an exhibition of designs by Neave Brown, Martin Richardson et al, or that they would have been happy to exhibit there. More evidence of the balancing effects of time.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.