Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

THE AF SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO COMPROMISE

  • Comment
LETTERS

Allies and Morrison's new design for the Architecture Foundation headquarters in London (AJ 20.07.06) is a significant departure from the first competition-winning design by Zaha Hadid. It is certainly a less striking building and one wonders if Hadid's original design would have won if it had looked like this latest version. Surely the budget should have been taken into account, so that a true reection of the winning scheme could have been built, and this kind of sad compromise avoided?

Allies and Morrison, in this difficult situation, is not at fault and has probably produced a decent building. Rather it's the client who is to blame for awarding first prize to a scheme which they should have known could not be built within the budget.

Is the knowledge of how to cost building works not a core architectural skill in the UK any more? If this is the case, then perhaps the Architecture Foundation should include a QS on the judging panel next time.

Michael Badu, NPS Property Consultants

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.