Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment

How cheering that you have seen through the hype that requires us to welcome any would-be 'icon' churned out by a signature architect, and tellingly pointed out both the mediocrity of Herzog & de Meuron's design for enlarging Tate Modern and the inconsistency of Sir Nicholas Serota in promoting it (AJ 27.07.06).

I had welcomed the original conversion of Bankside Power Station, as it (largely) retained Gilbert Scott's 'temple of power' - even though the Swiss architects chosen for the work had neither understanding of nor respect for his monumental brick architecture. But you did not mention that if the plans for the gratuitous ziggurat are endorsed as expected, we will lose yet more of Bankside, as the extension replaces over half of Gilbert Scott's symmetrical south elevation - including its central entrance.

Insensitivity and ineptitude, or more egomaniacal vandalism?

Gavin Stamp, by email

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.