Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Tate Modern is not all it's cracked up to be

  • Comment
LETTERS

It seems to me that the 'success' of the new Tate Modern owes more to great PR than good design.

The architectural intervention is nihilistic rather than contextual and works against Gilbert Scott's original rather than with it.

It is difficult to comprehend how the original great central space could be reduced to such a joyless box but here it is. In an effort to stamp their 'minimalist' mark the architects make spaces which are devoid of personality and extremely crudely detailed.

Why can't the cafe be accessed directly from the river?

Why can't you see the Thames and St Paul's from the roof without getting in a queue? Why can't you see where you're going and how to get there without having to ask? Why is the main design stairway tucked in a corner? What on earth is that on the chimney? Why is it a joy to leave rather than a delight to linger?

Alan Dunlop , received on the online Discussion Forum Visit www. ajplus. co. uk to read responses to this letter or to add to the debate

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.