Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Tallest tower in Liverpool redesigned again

  • 13 Comments

[FIRST LOOK] The AJ can reveal these images of Leach Rhodes Walker’s latest attempt to build the tallest building in the north of England

The proposed 165m-tall, 54-storey skyscraper is at least the third design to have been drawn up by the practice for the site close to Liverpool’s historic waterfront at the junction of the Strand and Leeds Street. 

The new £130 million plans are 5m-shorter than the previous proposals – again backed by Y1 Developments and Richmont Properties – that were submitted for planning in 2007 (pictured below).

Despite the trim, the ‘completely redesigned’ mixed-use tower would still edge above the North’s current tallest-building-title holder – Ian Simpson’s 157m-high Beetham Tower in Manchester – and Liverpool’s own skyscraper champion, Aedas’ Tower West.

Replacing the former King Edward Public House, the building has been sited to ‘provide a continuation of the pedestrian link from Old Hall Street through to the proposed Liverpool Waters and the waterfront’ and the base of the tower will house shops, cafés and bars.

The project backers claim the scheme has been developed following ‘productive negotiations’ with CABE. The developers will be hoping for a better review of the tower than its previous plans (click here to read the full 2008 review).

Subject to planning, work could start on site early 2011 with the building completed in 2014.

2007 proposals - Leach Rhodes Walker's 'King Eddy' tower - set to be the tallest in Liverpool

2007 proposals - Leach Rhodes Walker’s ‘King Eddy’ tower - set to be the tallest in Liverpool

 

  • 13 Comments

Readers' comments (13)

  • Scrap it and forget it. Hubris is last century. Liverpool has suffered enough of this sort of nonsense.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Maybe they should have a 4th try...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Shove

    It's a bit early for April 1st jokes surely.. The Liverpool skyline needs this like a spotty teenager needs another mars bar..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It just keeps on getting better and better.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can it get any worse.
    http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2010/02/another-carbuncle-planned-this-time-its.html
    Another stretched shoebox in the sky.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Firstly..lets give the tower its 'correct title'
    namely King Edwards Tower.Not Eddy's Tower.
    Once again we find quite a few snipers aiming
    at any proposition for Liverpool that exceeds
    twelve stories...well its time to get used to the
    fact that we do not live in a museum..
    unlike the members of CABE etc.This will be
    the first of hopefully a North Liverpool clutter
    of modern build..I wish the project well..as a
    resident of North Liverpool

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ken Dodd is a comedian but even Ken would have difficulty coming up with a bigger laugh than this. Well done, good joke, now let's see the real proposal.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its strange that the development Cabal of Liverpool always seem to hit out at anyone who poses a threat to their boring schemes this time its CABE they themselsves who have been instrumental in destroying Liverpools Skyline with bad advice. George McIver uses the correct term "clutter" , so why would any city want to "clutter" its World Heritage Site. It does not seem to be the correct architectural ambition.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • feriHa  ozTURK

    nooooooooooooo.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Not against towers but this one is just Pig Ugly.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Show 1020results per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.