Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Take a risk by all means but it could add to cost

  • Comment
letters

I am entirely with Will Alsop in his belief that caution can lack sparkle (AJ 2.5.02), but he oversimplifies the issue.

He implies we are isolated individuals, out to please ourselves by our own dexterity. This can only be true for one-off cases. Even then, we have to ensure the client sees our point of view, which often requires a high degree of persuasiveness.

In the town or city where buildings must contribute to the overall environment, where height, width, relationship, dynamic contrasts, focal points and delayed vistas might each have to be considered along with the client's preferences, taking risks to add sparkle may add to the complexity, and the cost.

First and foremost, town or city streets, squares and special buildings, quite subconsciously, must be a delight - not simply each individual unrelated little or large gem.

Such a building has its place, and where better than as a 'highlight' amid relative mediocrity?

So, take the right risk in the right places.

Alsop's article was written in Venice - what better place to prove a point?

Richard Brown, Poole, Dorset

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.