Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Sutton on hand to solve roof situation comedy

  • Comment

Clive Edgehill's slight, but rather overbearing, letter regarding the roof oversail of my little house (AJ 28.10.04) is self-righteously concerned about a situation that probably will never happen.

The existing Victorian house is a spacious double-frontage four-bedroom dwelling not easily convertible into flats. There are no roof extensions locally on this type of building (terrace with valley roof and front parapet wall) and the planners would take an awful lot of persuading to allow one to happen.

However, should any future occupant want to go to the considerable expense of extending upwards and gain consent to do so, they could, of course, exercise their air rights. Any modification of the oversail could be done easily and would be covered by a party-wall agreement in the usual way. Far from being an 'indignity' or 'comeuppance', it could pose an interesting design challenge to resolve the two elements.

Relax Clive, there are more important things to worry about.

Pete Sutton, Pete Sutton Architects, London N5

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.