Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Summit style

  • Comment
astragal

The big names were out in force at last week's Urban Summit, graced unexpectedly by chancellor Gordon Brown, who made a significant rather under-reported speech, dealing with a host of issues from stamp duty to the 'third way' for regional assistance programmes. Politically, it was Labour minus Blair, no doubt what Gordon had in mind.

Conservationists were immediately up in arms over Gordon's announcement that Business Planning Zones would indeed come into being - provided the relevant local authority wanted one in its area. Given that he had attacked the Tory enterprise zone idea earlier in his speech, this all sounded a shade hypocritical. BPZs are, philosophically, pretty much the same idea; the fact they are voluntary is only really saying that the most important wave of areas have already been dealt with. One question which did not get asked at the conference concerns the Thames Gateway, where one million homes are planned. Here is the question: Isn't this area in a flood plain? Won't it require massive infrastructure work to bring it to acceptable levels (unless the homes are built on stilts)? Why can't we build the homes within a real urban area rather than as an outpost of Dagenham, which, as the old joke has it, is two stops short of Barking?

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.