Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Steven Holl: Written in Water

  • Comment
review

Lars Muller Publishers, 2002. 400pp. £30

Steven Holl is probably best known here for his Kiasma Museum in Helsinki, which attracted plenty of, largely positive, attention in the architectural press, writes Andrew Mead; and hardly a month now seems to go by without him being shortlisted in a competition somewhere in the world.An AJ reviewer last year praised 'the honesty and painstaking quality'of Holl's designs, saying that he 'deserves a wider audience' (AJ 17.5.01).

Written in Water, however - beautifully produced though it is - seems more of an indulgence for Holl than a source of insight for that audience.With the briefest of texts at front and back, it presents 365 of Holl's watercolours from the past 10 years, one to a page, like a bulky 5 x 7 sketchbook. 'In the meditations associated with the initial conception of a building, its first stirring towards form, space and light, the watercolours played a crucial role, 'he says, maintaining that they are 'not directed towards self-expression' but instead 'fuse intuition with a concept'.

So this is not Le Corbusier's Le Voyage d'Orient, full of responses to existing architecture and the works of other people; nor are these first sketches embedded in the full analysis of a finished project.Holl's watercolours have to stand entirely on their own.To do so in such quantity, they either have to deliver aesthetically, whatever architectural concepts they explore; or those concepts, and the forms they find, or the effects of light and space they indicate, must be unusually compelling. A very small minority meet that first criterion (the study for the Seattle chapel, pictured, is one); by no means enough meet the second; and do we really need Holl's 'Homage to Rothko'?

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.