Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Stations of the Cross headline is offensive

  • Comment
Letters

I have just read the piece by Andrew Mead headlined 'Stations of the Cross' (AJ 3.8.00).

I find the use of this headline offensive. In case you do not know or have overlooked the significance of this, for Christians in particular it represents the extreme suffering of the Son ofGod on our behalf for our sins. It involved flogging with whips with metal (lead) dumbells attached till the soldiers had to stop in case Jesus died before crucifixion.

It represents the insults of the soldiers and the pressing of a crown of thorns onto his head, the beating with rods, the carrying of the cross through the crowd to Golgatha, stripping him of his garments and nailing him to the wood through his wrists and feet.

Perhaps you now see why this term should not be used lightly and out of context.

Ralph Pattisson, Newcastle upon Tyne

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.