Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Speaking up for human rights in China

  • Comment
letters

Astragal is not usually noted for its political naivete but, on this occasion, ('China syndrome' - aj 13.5.99) has excelled itself.

May I humbly point out that political regimes are notorious for changing their colours and few more dramatically than the Chinese government. In the years immediately following the Tiananmen Square massacre, there was a tangible move towards a greater liberalisation of attitude, and it was during this period, in the early 1990s, that Richard Rogers Partnership submitted its masterplan for Shanghai - a project which, as it happens, came to nought.

However, following a damning report in April by Amnesty International, citing a significant worsening of China's human-rights record, I felt obliged to raise the issue at the riba Council, prior to the proposed attendance by riba delegates at the uia Congress in Beijing.

The sensible (and unopposed) decision was taken by Council to attend the congress but to be as vocal as possible in airing the RIBA's view of the current regime.

I fail to see how this can be construed as anything other than an honest and positive position to adopt.

Marco Goldschmied, Richard Rogers Partnership

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.