Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Sky-high ambition bound to cause controversy

  • Comment
letters

Not all residents of the existing Beetham Tower in Liverpool are against the recently approved West Tower (AJ 28.4.05); many of us are in favour of the proposal.

You use the controversy over several skyscrapers as evidence that Liverpool's regeneration is 'stuttering'. Am I to assume that your correspondent would expect 40-storey and 50-storey developments close to a World Heritage Site to be uncontroversial?

Liverpool's regeneration is already achieving a critical mass in terms of quantity.

The great battle now is to raise expectations and to demand the highest quality of new architecture, while safeguarding the city's unique townscape. With this in mind, developers such as Grosvenor and public authorities such as the city council are encouraging wide participation and debate.

The scale of development is astonishing, more controversy is inevitable, and the battle for design quality is ongoing. Could the AJ join in, rather than just heckling from the sidelines?

Perhaps it's time for a special issue focusing on the city as a whole, or on the Paradise Project in particular.

Trevor Skempton, Beetham Tower, Old Hall Street, Liverpool

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.