Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Seifert's City tower faces demolition after listing failure

  • Comment

Richard Seifert's 1967 Drapers' Gardens tower in the City of London (pictured) remains under threat, following arts minister Baroness Blackstone's decision not to grant the building listed status.

The Twentieth Century Society - which has attacked the judgement - applied for a spot listing in June after the corporation gave planning consent to a Foggo Associates scheme that includes the demolition of the 99.5m tower.

The practice wants to replace the existing structure - considered by the society to be a better example of Seifert's work than Centre Point - with an 18-storey skyscraper.

Blackstone removed the last legal hurdle to the Foggo scheme because 'Seifert's building is not historically or architecturally significant enough to warrant listing', despite a report from English Heritage calling for it to be given Grade II status.

But Twentieth Century Society director Catherine Croft said she was 'really disappointed' with the decision as 'we consider it a really fine example of design and sufficiently different to Seifert's other work to be worth saving'.

She claimed the ruling is a prime example of ministers taking into account the economic merits of a building over its architectural importance.

And Croft added that many, including Blackstone, fail to understand that listing is 'not just about freezing a building in time', it is a way of encouraging developers to work within existing structures. 'This is certainly the situation with this decision, ' she said.

Drapers' Gardens could still be reprieved, however. Foggo Associates' client, the Royal Bank of Scotland, is undertaking an internal review that could affect the future of the scheme.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs