Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Scottish Tories fume at cost of RMJM's parliament building

  • Comment

The projected final cost for RMJM's Scottish Parliament building at Holyrood has increased to more than £300 million, leading to calls for an immediate debate on the issue from Scottish Conservatives.

The latest rise in costs is being blamed on an increase in security considerations following recent troubles in the Swiss, Indian and French parliaments, in local government buildings - and, of course, the 11 September attacks.

The initial maximum cost of the project was set at £40 million in 1997. However, this was prior to devolution and based on a conservatively projected floor space at a modest cost per square metre. The first estimate, after plans were drawn up by the late Catalan architect Enric Miralles, was £109 million.

This escalated after the death of Miralles and former Scottish first minister Donald Dewar to £195 million, the level at which the Scottish Parliament capped spending on the building in 2000.

That constraint was lifted the following year and costs have crept up ever since.

However, Scottish Parliament spokesman James McKenzie was quick to point out that the money is still well spent. 'We are constructing a public sector building with a 100-year projected lifespan, ' he said. 'We have just received the final part of our BREEAM assessment, and we received an 'excellent' rating on all three areas of the site. In addition, a great deal of time has been spent making sure that the disabled access is first class, and we have recently heard from the EU that it believes the scheme will have the best disabled access of any public building in Europe.'

Scottish Tory chiefs are still up in arms over the increased spending, with their leader David McLetchie suggesting that the money could have been far better spent on public services. Project architect RMJM declined to comment.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs

AJ Jobs