Unsupported browser

For a better experience please update your browser to its latest version.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

RIBA must define what a 'building' actually is

  • Comment
letters

I clearly recall that the London Eye was denied the Stirling Prize because it was - at the last minute - deemed not to be a building.

The prize has now gone to a (very deserving) bridge, but not without the same 'it's not a building' jibes.

Has the Stirling seen the light, or is this just good old inconsistency?

For the avoidance of future fiascos, not to mention injustice, could the Stirling organisers simply define what is, and is not, eligible? And could they do so more than five minutes before next year's final decision?

Mira Bar-Hillel, via e-mail

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.